ARPIT GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME AND AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9841/2024 · 2025-11-07
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9841 of 2024 AND CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None for the petitioners.
3. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case.
4. Both the above mentioned writ petitions have been filed challenging the FIR dated 12.12.2024 vide Crime No. 514/2024 under Section 316(5) BNSS, Police Station Laharpur, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
5. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 7.11.2025 received Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shrawan Kumar, Lalla Ji Maurya, Nuzhat Ali Siddiqui, Pankaj Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Verma, Arvind Kumar Verma, Harish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Arpit Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home And And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Ramashankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
from Sri Sabir Ali, Inspector/IO, PS Laharpur, District Sitapur, a copy of which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that Final Report No. 13/25 dated 1.6.2025 has been forwarded in the matter, therefore, the petitions have become infructuous. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners.
6. Both the petitions are dismissed accordingly. November 7, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 9841 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench