PAPPU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/9134/2024 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181456 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181456 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9134 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition nor there is any request for pass over or adjournment of the case, whereas learned AGA for the State is present.
2. On 4.12.2024, the following order was passed:-
"1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. Present writ petition is filed by petitioner for a mandamus directing respondents to conduct a fair investigation in F.I.R. No.0488/2024 registered at P.S. Harganv, District-Sitapur, U/s 137(2) & 87 B.N.S., 2023 in case of minor daughter of petitioner.
3. Learned A.G.A. on instructions states that they have come to know about the location of the victim and all efforts are being made for her recovery and also for recording her statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S.
4. List this case on 16.12.2024.
5. Meanwhile, Investigating Officer concerned shall also file an affidavit with regard to active investigation made in the case along with statement of the victim."
3. Learned AGA on the basis of para nos. 26 and 27 of the counter affidavit submits that the victim was recovered on 11.1.2025 and her statement under Section 180 B.N.S.S. was recorded. The accused Riyaz was arrested on the same day, i.e., 11.1.2025. The statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. was to be recorded and after collecting the evidence, the police report was to be forwarded. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jiyauddeen Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pappu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. In view of the above, it appears that either the petition has rendered infructuous or the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
5. Dismissed for non prosecution. November 19, 2025 Shravan CRLP No. 9134 of 2024 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench