KULDEEP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/11627/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181454 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181454 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11627 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None appears for informant despite notice.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 261 of 2025, under sections 65(1), 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Gurubuxganj, District Raebareli.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR lodged on 31.8.2025 it was alleged that on 9.8.2025 the applicant came into the home of informant and committed wrong on her. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years. Medical on record does not corroborate the offence in question.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the substantial delay in lodging the FIR and medical on record not corroborating the allegations, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 1.9.2025 and has explained his criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Kuldeep be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kuldeep .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11627 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench