Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181451 (ALL)

KAILASH NATH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECY.AND OTHERS

WRIC/1003503/2006 · 2025-11-27

Irshad Ali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1003503 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. In the matter, there are three counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. One of them, Shri Salik Ram Tiwari, learned Advocate has sent illness slip and other counsel have not put in appearance for the petitioner. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pressing the case. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 27, 2025 GK Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neelam Tyagi, Arvind Tripathi, Salik Ram Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.N.Gupta (Irshad Ali,J.) Kailash Nath Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through The Principal Secy.And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM KUMAR SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench