Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18145 (HP)

MANGLA DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/10164/2025 · 2025-06-25

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10164/2025 Decided on: 25.06.2025 Mangla Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Trained Graduate Teacher (Medical) at Government Senior Secondary School Kamalar, District Sirmour, H.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has completed her requisite tenure at the present place of posting. That in view of certain adverse family circumstances being faced by the petitioner, she preferred a representation dated 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-6) seeking her adjustment. The petitioner followed the said representation with another representation dated 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 14.05.2025 (Annexure P-7). Getting no response, the petitioner was compelled to institute this writ petition. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondent/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-6) for her adjustment, considering her adverse family circumstances as highlighted in the said representation and in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy, while keeping in view the adverse family circumstances pointed by the petitioner, within a period of ten days from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 25th June, 2025(rohit)