HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11025 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 15.10.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3 i.e. Assistant Regional Transport Officer (R.T.O.), Ayodhya is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 27, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suryansh Narula Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mr. Niyaz Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Transport U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench