RASHMI SINGH AND OTHERS v. SHRI RAMIT SHARMA, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, PRAYAGARAJ AND OTHERS
CAPL/2698/2023 · 2025-12-10
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2698 of 2023 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Learned State Counsel on the instruction received has submitted that in compliance of the judgement and order dated 21.2.2023 the representation of the applicant has been decided by passing an order dated 25.11.2025, the copy of which has been provided during the course of argument and a photo copy of the same has been provided to learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgement and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
3. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. December 10, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kirti Veer Singh, Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Rashmi Singh And Others .....Applicant(s) Shri Ramit Sharma, Commissioner Of Police, Prayagaraj And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench