Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:48118
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1635 of 2025 1 - Chandrabhan Gendley S/o Rupkumar Gendley Aged About 33 Years R/o Sagar Homes, Nature City, P.S. Sakri Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Lav Dewangan S/o Vijendra Kumar Dewangan, R/o Karbala Road, Juna Bilaspur, P.S. City Kotwali Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Incharge Police Station Takhatpur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate. For State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board 18.09.2025
1. The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed against the
order dated 10.02.2025 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, District Bilaspur (CG) in Criminal Revision No.161/2024 arising out of order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the JMFC, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur in Criminal Case No.206/2011.
2. The petitioners/accused filed an application before the JMFC, Takhatpur for closure of prosecution evidence which was rejected vide order dated
19.07.2024. Against the said order, the petitioners preferred a revision i.e. Criminal Revision No.161/2024 which was dismissed by learned 3nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, District – Bilaspur (C.G.) vide impugned
order dated 10.02.2025 leading to the filing of this petition. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.19 20:55:50 +0530
2
3.
Learned counsel for the State as well learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that one of the co-accused Sourabh Sahu in Criminal Case No.206/2011 filed CRMP No.1690 of 2025 which has been disposed of by the coordinate Bench of this Court and the direction for expeditious trial of the case has already been issued in the case concerned.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the petition.
5. The petition filed by the co-accused has been disposed of by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08-08-2025 passed in CRMP No.1690 of 2025 wherein in para 3 to 7 it has been observed that :-
“3. The trial is going on since September, 2011. There are total 53 witnesses out of which, as per learned counsel for petitioner, only 15 witnesses have been examined till date. Trial is taking
consideration time for its conclusion. 4 Taking these facts into consideration, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and ensure that the trial is concluded as expeditiously as possible.
5. The prosecution wing and the petitioner are also directed to render full cooperation in expeditious conclusion of the trial.
6. Accordingly, the present CRMP stands disposed of.
7. The Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order forthwith to the trial Court concerned as well as the prosecution wing for necessary information.”
6. In view of the aforesaid direction and observation made in CRMP No.1690 of 2025 (Sourabh Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh) vide order dated 08-08-2025, the present petition is disposed of in the similar terms. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge Aadil