VINAY LOHRA ALIAS VINAY KUMAR LOHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5825/2025 · 2025-07-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18141 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18141 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:19064 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5825 of 2025
------ Vinay Lohra @ Vinay Kumar Lohra, aged about 35 years, son of Dashrath Lohra, resident of Village-Borsidag, P.O.- Chandwa, P.S.-Chandwa, Dist.-Latehar, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate ------
Order No.02 Dated- 14.07.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.91 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 64(2) (m) of the B.N.S.,
2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner repeatedly committed rape upon the victim. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant by drawing attention of this Court to I.A. No. 8973 of 2025 which is supported by separate affidavits of the friend of the petitioner and the informant that therein it has categorically been mentioned that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and because of some misunderstanding, this case was instituted. It is further submitted that the informant has no objection if the petitioner is granted bail and at best it is a case of consensual sexual relationship between the parties. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.04.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application and charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next
submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Latehar, in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.91 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/