Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181399 (MAD)

SUNAL @ KOTTEESWARAN v. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/28050/2025 · 2025-10-14

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 1. Sunal @ Kotteeswaran 2. Subash 3. Nagaraj @ Rolas Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Kadambattur Police Station, Crime No. 146/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail pending investigation in Crime No. 146/2025 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.09.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 109, 309(4) & 351(3) of BNS Act (Sections 341, 294(b), 307, 392 & 506(II) of IPC), in Crime No.146 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.1,900/- from him. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they have been falsely implicated due to previous cases, are not connected to the crime, the property has been recovered, and they have been in judicial custody from 21.09.2025. He further submitted that the petitioners are willing to co-operate with the investigation and abide by any conditions, seeking bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent reported that on 20.09.2025, the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 demanded money, and robbed Rs.1,900/- at knife point. He further submitted that the 1 st petitioner is having 12 previous cases, 2 nd petitioner is having 4 previous cases and the 3 rd petitioner is having 5 previous cases and the investigation is pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 5. Considering the gravity of the offence, the petitioners' bad antecedent, and the ongoing investigation, releasing them on bail may lead to absconding, evidence tampering, or hindering the investigation. This Court is not inclined to grant bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14-10-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 To 1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Kadambattur Police Station, Crime No. 146/2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 28050 of 2025 14-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis