SANTOSH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.ADDL.CHIEF SECY.BASIC EDUCATION and ORS.
WRIA/393/2021 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181396 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181396 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 393 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meenakshi Singh Parihar, Dharmendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Singh Chuahan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Santosh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Addl.Chief Secy.Basic Education And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench