- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5270 WP No. 5608 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 5608 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. ANIL KUMAR TUMU @ T.ANIL KUMAR, SON OF SIVARAM MOHAN DAS, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT: NO. 503, E BLOCK, AQUA BUILDING, OZONE URBANA, KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE, BENGALURU-562 110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHAMANTH.S.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: MR. GHANSHYAM DAS MUNDRA RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF M/S. KARUTURI GLOBAL LTD., HAVING OFFICE AT: E-204, ASHOK GARDEN, T.J. ROAD, SEWREE, MUMBAI-400 015. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHREYAS JAYASIMHA., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5270 WP No. 5608 of 2020 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 22.07.2024, on that day, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed after two weeks. The petition is listed today. The petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of February 2025. It's pending for almost five years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 35