HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6440 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1. 2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in the present case was decided by means of revisional order dated 29.05.2025, by the Deputy Director of Consolidation where the matter was remanded to the Consolidation Officer for deciding the same afresh after receiving fresh evidence. 4. Against order dated 29.05.2025, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition C No. 9502 of 2025, wherein by means of interim order dated 09.10.2025, limited interim protection was granted to the extent that so far as remand is concerned, same shall remain stayed till the next date of listing. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, has been filed for direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, Sultanpur for recording name of the petitioner as well as rest of the Patta holders in the revenue records in compliance of order dated 25.07.2025, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya. 6. It is noticed that entire controversy has culminated in the order of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar, Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kamlesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 29.05.2025, against which revision has been preferred by the petitioner where interim order dated 09.10.2025, has been passed. In case with regard to same dispute petitioner seeks further direction to any of the party, then it is open for him to file appropriate application in the pending writ petition and this Court finds that no separate cause of action has arisen to entertain fresh writ petition for the same dispute. 7. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that prayer made by the petitioner can be made in the pending writ petition and no fresh cause of action has arisen to file present writ petition. 8. Subject to aforesaid observations, this Court do not find any ground for interference in the matter. The writ petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. November 4, 2025 A. Verma A227 No. 6440 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench