Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18137 (GAU)

SAMHITA DAS AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/4906/2023 · 2025-03-20

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010188932023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4906/2023 SAMHITA DAS AND ANR WIFE OF PINTU DEB, RESIDENT OF - TOWN MAIN ROAD, KARIMGANJ, WARD NO. 17, PO, PS AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, PIN- 788710. 2: SASHANKA SEAL SON OF SANKAR SEAL VILLAGE- INATHPUR PO- AMBARKHANA PS AND DIST- KARIMGANJ PIN- 788712 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-03. 3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER CACHAR-KARIMGANJ CIRCLE (IRRIGATION) SILCHAR Page No.# 2/3 CACHAR. 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARIMGANJ NORTH- KARIMGANJ SOUTH- BADARPUR DIVISION IRRIGATION KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ. 5:THE SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR PORMOTION OF GRADE-III AND GRADE-IV STAFFS UNDER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARIMGANJ NORTH- KARIMGANJ SOUTH- BADARPUR DIVISION IRRIGATION KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ TO BE REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 6:THE COMMITTEE TO TRANSFER AND POSTING OF OFFICERS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 7:DUDUL ROY SON OF HIMANGSHU SHEKAR ROY RESIDENT OF C/O- SANTANU DEY SUBHASH NAGAR VIBAKANANDA BYE LANE WARD NO. 15 P.O. P.S. AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ PIN- 788710. 8:ARNAB PAUL CHOUDHURY SON OF ANUP PAL CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF SUBASH NAGAR RADHARAMAN ASHRAM BYE LANE Page No.# 3/3 WARD NO. 15 (OLD) PO PS AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ PIN- 788710 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T J MAHANTA, MR. R A MAZUMDER,MR. R A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 21.03.2025 It is submitted by Mr. RA Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the petitioners do not wish to press this writ petition any further. Mr. N. UPadhyaya, learned Standing Counsel Irrigation Department is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, also stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant