MOHAMMAD ANIS AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/4079/2024 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4079 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. This petition has been filed challenging an F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.0220/2024, under Sections 302, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Biswa, District Sitapur.
4. Perusal of order sheet indicates that on the first date, time was granted to learned A.G.A. to produce inquest report and, thereafter, the matter has not been pursued by learned counsel for the petitioners.
5. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions received from Sri Mukul Prakash Verma, Incharge Inspector, Police Station Biswa, District Sitapur, which have been placed before this Court and taken on record, submits that Charge Sheet No.471/24 dated 04.12.2024 under Sections 306, 506 I.P.C. has been filed in the Court against the petitioner Nos.1, 2 & 3 whereas name of petitioner No.4, Imran, has been dropped as nothing incriminating material has been found against him, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy and the petitioners have remedy either before the concerned Court or to challenge the same under appropriate proceedings. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh, Virijendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Lalla Ji Maurya Mohammad Anis And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to controvert the same.
6. In view of above, since the prima facie allegations have been found proved against the petitioner Nos.1, 2 & 3 on the basis of materials collected during investigation, therefore, the charge sheet has been filed in the Court against them and the name of petitioner No.4, Imran has been dropped during investigation and the petitioners have a remedy before the appropriate Court or to challenge the charge sheet under appropriate proceedings, no purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending, when the petitioners themselves are not pursuing the matter.
7. Dismissed accordingly.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 1, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 4079 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench