AJAY KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO and OTHERS
WRIA/996/2021 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181352 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181352 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 996 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Pande Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sarvesh Kumar Dubey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ajay Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench