ANUJ MATANHELIA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/7190/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7190 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Hariom Singh, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned District Judge, Bahraich to decide the Civil Revision No.20 of 2024 expeditiously.
3. The learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that State of U.P. has wrongly been impleaded in the present petition which is neither a necessary nor a proper party to the petition.
4. After advancing submissions at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the petition.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. December 15, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Anuj Matanhelia And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench