Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18135 (HP)

CHANDER BHANU VASHISHT AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.PT/218/2024 · 2025-01-03

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition(T) No. 218/2024 Decided on: 03.01.2025 Chander Bhanu Vashisht & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Advocate Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Petitioners have alleged non-compliance to the decision rendered in Ravinder Singh & Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.2. 2. Respondents have filed reply to the execution petition. Reply states that some of the petitioners in Ravinder Singh’s case2 had preferred Execution Petition No. 131/2023 for implementation of the aforesaid decision. Taking note of the office order passed by the respondents on 03.04.2024, the said execution petition was disposed of on 04.04.2024 with the observations that the judgment dated 16.04.2018 stood implemented under the aforesaid order. Liberty was reserved to the petitioners therein to seek appropriate remedy, in 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2OA No. 2969/2017 decided on 16.04.2018 2 accordance with law, for their surviving grievances including against the office order dated 03.04.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were not aware about the passing of the order dated 03.04.2024 and the filing of the Execution Petition No. 131/2023, which was disposed of on 04.04.2024. Learned counsel, however, further submits that since the respondents have already passed implementation order dated 03.04.2024, therefore, this execution proceedings be now closed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to assail the aforesaid office order dated 03.04.2024. 4. In view of above submissions and the documents placed on record, the present proceedings are closed. It shall be open for the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of their surviving grievances,if any, including against the office order dated 03.04.2024. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 03rd January 2025 (rohit)