HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11515 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, one case has been shown against the applicant. In that solitary case, the applicant has been enlarged on bail. The bail order is on record (Annexure No.3). Apart from the said case, there is no other case pending against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 27.11.2024. It is also submitted that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 3.Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also considering the nature of allegations, the applicant has been enlarged on bail in the case shown in the gang chart, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the applicant is a lady, for the period for which she Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Bux Singh, Anubhav Singh Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rizwana .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 5.Let the applicant Rizwana wife of Mohd. Saleem, involved in Case Crime No.152 of 2025 under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S.Kotwali Nagar, district Sultanpur, be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant shall also file an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that she will not indulge in any case or misuse the liberty of bai l. Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. 6.The bail application is allowed accordingly. November 25, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 11515 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench