HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1578 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Veerbahadur Lal Srivastava, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.249 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of BNS, Police Station Gudamba, District Lucknow. 3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the husband of the informant was staying as a tenant and was also having a relationship with one of the accused no.1. Subsequently, the accused no.1 informed that the husband of the informant found dead. It was also alleged that prior to the date of incident, one of the accused no.6 had called and threatened that in case the husband of the informant does not improve, he would have to lose his life and subsequently, the family members of the accused no.1 had killed the husband of the deceased. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the applicant Prinshu Singh is the wife of Shiv Ram Singh who was the partner of the deceased as is evident from the bail rejection order. Ex-facie, no allegation of the offence under Section Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Dubey, Vishram Kumar Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Prinshu Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 103 of BNS have been levelled against the applicant, as such, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Prinshu Singh be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond and sureties of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 30, 2025 akverma NABAIL No. 1578 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench