HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6605 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Short counter affidavit, filed by learned A.G.A. on behalf of State today in Court, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioners and as such, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 12, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Smt. Mohammadi Bano And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench