SADHANA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/9316/2024 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181308 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181308 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9316 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has made a statement at bar that the investigation has already been concluded, and a charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the said facts. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 20, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaushalendra K. Tripathi, Avinash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pramod Kumar (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sadhana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench