NEK SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/12022/2025 · 2025-12-12
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12022 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner is present to press this petition nor any request for adjournment of the same has been made.
3. Heard Shri Hariom Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State.
4. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the respondent no.2 and has sought issuance of a direction to the respondent no.2 for renewal of the fire arm licence bearing No.421/II.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the maintainability of the writ petition and has submitted that the petitioner has got a remedy of filing of appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act available, therefore, the present petition should not be entertained.
6. In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed by leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act against the impugned order. December 12, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hom Narayan Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Nek Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench