( 2025:HHC:22337 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.506 of 2023 Date of Decision: 10.07.2025. Urmila Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Vishal Verma ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting. No. For the petitioner : Ms. Heena Verma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Dheeraj K. Verma, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral) In compliance of the order dated 13.05.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner has deposited 15% of the cheque amount before the H.P. State Legal Services Authority, Shimla. Receipt of deposit of amount of ₹21,000/- stands filed and the same is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has received the amount and he has instructions not to proceed with the complaint in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 3. In view of these facts, the present revision is allowed and the judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Shimla (H.P.) in Criminal Appeal No.4759/2022, titled Urmil Sharma Vs. Vishal Verma affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.7 on ( 2025:HHC:22337 ) 29.09.2022 are ordered to be set aside. The complaint filed by the complainant is ordered to be dismissed as not pressed. The amount of compensation/fine deposited by the accused stands already released and no further amount has been deposited by the accused/petitioner. 4. In view of the statement no order has been passed regarding the disbursal. The present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 10th July, 2025. (Shamsh Tabrez)