RAM KIRTI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.
WRIA/3272/2018 · 2025-10-29
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181298 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181298 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3272 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 29, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neeraj Chaurasiya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Kirti Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench