ANIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/1611/2025 · 2025-11-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1611 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.648 of 2024, under Section 64(1), 352, 351(3) BNS & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Motipur, District Bahraich.
3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was misbehaved with by the applicant. A similar statement was given under Section 180 BNSS, although, subsequently, she alleged rape also. Medical on record does not corroborate the allegation. Tentative age of the victim is around 15 to 16 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the medical report not corroborating the allegation, the applicant who is in custody since 09.01.2025 and has one case of criminal history in which he is on bail, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Anil Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Ambrish Kumar, Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pradeep Kumar Maurya, Priyanka Yadav, Rizwanul Haque Ansari Anil Kumar .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 7, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 1611 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench