Mubarak Ali and 9 Others v. Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Gonda, and 2 Others
A227/6556/2025 · 2025-11-11
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6556 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-
"(a) to issue direction to opposite party no-1 to consider and decide the case No.12315/2024 (Computerized Case No.T202408300612315), filed under section 133 Cr.P.C. on 29.03.2024, Israr Ali & others Vs Tayyab Ali, situated in Village- Tulsipur Manjha Pure Dafali, Police Station- Nababganj, District- Gonda with in time frame by the this Hon'ble Court." Considering the facts as stated, particularly the period of pendency of the case, which appears to be pending since March 2024, this application is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.1/Sub Divisional Magistrate, District-Gonda, to consider and decide the pending case in issue, as indicated in the prayer clause, quoted above, most expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of.
November 11, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Angrej Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.)
Mubarak Ali And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Gonda, And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench