SUNIL CHOMAL, v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
WP(PIL)/145/2021 · 2025-04-23
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18129 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18129 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010250672021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WP(PIL) NO: 145 of 2021 Bench Sr.No:-11 [3483] Sunil Chomal ...Petitioner Vs. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited Visakhapatnam Steel Plant and others
...Respondents
********** Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. M. Abhigna representing Mr. Javvaji Sarath Chandra Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : Mr. V Subrahmanyam for R.1 Mr. T S Rayalu for R.2 Deputy Solicitor General for R.5
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 23rd April 2025 P C :
Mr. Pasala Ponna Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General, appearing for respondent No.5 has referred to a communication, dated 14.10.2024, issued by the Under Secretary to the Government of India wherein it is stated that the complaints, reference whereto has been made by the petitioner in the WP(PIL) and specifically in paragraph No.5, 6(b) and 13, were examined in consultation with the concerned authorities and that no irregularity was found and the matter was closed.
The said communication is taken on record.
2 HCJ & RC, J WP(PIL)_145_2021
In view of the above, nothing survives in the present case.
The proceedings are, accordingly, closed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J Vjl