RAM LAKHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/2171/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181287 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181287 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2171 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant; Learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. By way of the present application, the applicant made a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No.257 of 2025, (State versus Ram Lakhan), arising out of Case Crime No.239 of 2024, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) BNS, Police Station Amethi, District Amethi as well as charge sheet dated 03.12.2024 along with summoning
order dated 07.02.2025 and Bailable warrant dated 01.07.2025 as well as Non Bailable warrant dated 02.12.2025 passed by the ACJM IV Sultanpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the prayer made in the application. He confines his prayer only to the extent that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773 and Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others MANU/SC/0851/2022.
4. Learned AGA is having no objection, if such a direction is given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supras). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Nath Pandey, Om Prakash Srivastav, Pushkar Dixit, Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Lakhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Accordingly, it is directed that if applicants appears before the trial court and apply for bail then, their bail application shall be decided by the court below on the basis of law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supras).
6. With these direction/observation, the present application is, accordingly,
disposed of. December 16, 2025 I.A. Siddiqui NA528 No. 2171 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench