SMT. SADHNA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BASIC EDU. AND ORS.
WRIA/12698/2018 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181286 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181286 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12698 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 16, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rahul Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Sadhna Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench