Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181281 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR @ GOLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/2585/2025 · 2025-11-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2585 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.128 of 2022, under Section 302 IPC, P.S. Dubagga, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that husband of the informant used to work as a labourer with the applicant and he had received certain money. Subsequently, both of them had drinks together and information was received that husband had received certain injuries for which he was receiving treatment. It was subsequently informed that the husband had died and on the basis of the information received it was alleged that the applicant had killed the husband of the informant. Cause of death, as per the postmortem report, is antemortem injuries and four wounds were noticed on the body of the deceased. No recovery was effected from the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 09.01.2024 and has no criminal antecedents. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the FIR was registered based upon the apprehension and the allegation that both of them had drinks together coupled with the fact that no recovery was effected from the applicant and there is no eyewitness to the incident, the applicant who has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Kumar @ Golu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vinay Kumar @ Golu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 2585 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench