SHAMIM AHMED LASKAR ALIAS SAMIM AHMED LASKAR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./2731/2025 · 2025-09-14
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18128 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18128 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010188722025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2731/2025 SHAMIM AHMED LASKAR ALIAS SAMIM AHMED LASKAR AND ANR S/O AFTAB UDDIN LASKAR VILL- BOALIPAR PART-III, P.O. BOALIPAR BAZAR DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM PIN-788155 2: SALIM AHMED LASKAR S/O AFTAB UDDIN LASKAR VILL- BOALIPAR PART-III
P.O. BOALIPAR BAZAR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-78815 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. SAYED SALIM AHMED,MS R DEKA,MR. I U CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 15.09.2025 Heard Mr. H R A Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel. Also heard Mr. P Lahkar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.
2. By this petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 the accused-petitioners, namely, (i) Shamim Ahmed Laskar @ Samim Ahmed Laskar (ii) Salim Ahmed Laskar, who were arrested on 11.08.2025 in connection with Silchar PS Case No. 806/2025 under Sections 61(2)/112(2)/316(2)/318(4) BNS read with Section 10 of The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means), Act, 2024.
3. It is submitted that FSL report has not yet been received. It appears that previously the prosecution was granted time to submit the FSL report. The allegation against the accused is that he carried a mobile phone inside the examination hall when examination for the post of Block Accountant was being conducted by ASLRMS on 10.08.2025. The accused was arrested on 11.08.2025 and the FIR was lodged by the Principal of the Institution. Although there appears to be incriminating material against the accused persons in the CD, having regard to the nature of the allegations and the period of detention of 35 days, the prayer for bail is allowed.
Page No.# 3/3
4. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioners, named above, shall be allowed to go on bail of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount in connection with the aforesaid case subject to the satisfaction of CJM, Cachar, Silchar.
5. The Bail Application stands disposed of. Return the CD.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant