ANJU @ ANNO DEVI THRU. HER MOTHER SARITA DEVI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/11390/2025 · 2025-12-03
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11390 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party no.4 is dispensed with.
3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the FIR dated 03.11.2025 lodged vide Case Crime No.0744 of 2025, under Sections 109, 110, 115(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the aforesaid FIR has been lodged under the aforesaid provisions of BNS
2023. As per version of the said FIR, the petitioner along with several others had fought with the complainant and his family members and had also indulged in stone throwing which has resulted in serious injuries being caused to the complainant.
5. The contention is that the aforesaid FIR has been lodged apparently on false allegations and the respondent authorities are harassing the petitioner on the pretext of the aforesaid FIR.
6. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 02.12.2025 sent by Sri Abhishek, Sub Inspector, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki, that the matter is being investigated. However, she fairly points out that as per the medical report only simple injuries have been suffered by the complainant.
7. The aforesaid statement of learned AGA is recorded and the writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anju @ Anno Devi Thru. Her Mother Sarita Devi And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to not take any coercive action against the petitioners till filing of the charge sheet/final report.
8. Needless to mention that the petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and in case of non-cooperation, the benefit of this order would not be available to the petitioners. December 3, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 11390 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench