ANIL KUMAR MISHRA v. RAVI RANJAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR U.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD.
CAPL/4488/2024 · 2025-12-03
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4488 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that all the admissible dues with interest/penal interest has been paid to the applicant and the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has raised an objection regarding the determination of the amount paid as interest and after arguing at some length, he has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant if he is still aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, he may be permitted to challenge the same by filing a writ petition. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. However, it is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. December 3, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rajeeva Kumar Sinha (Manish Kumar,J.) Anil Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) Ravi Ranjan, Managing Director U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench