- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2998 WP No. 49072 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 49072 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. UNITY TRUST (R) NO. 162 A, 9TH CROSS, SHIVAJI MAIN ROAD, N.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU - 560 007. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 2. SMT. HAJIRA SHARIFF, D/O. AZMAL AHMED SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO. 162/A, 9TH CROSS, SHIVAJI MAIN ROAD, N.R.MOHALLA, MYSURU - 560 007. 3. AZMAL AHMED SHARIFF, S/O. NAZIR AHMED SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NO. 15/319, PRASHANTH NILAYA, COURT ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGAR. 4. SMT. SYEDA JAVERIA OBED, W/O. ABDUL REHMAN NAUSHAD, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO. 162A, 1ST FLOOR, 9TH CROSS, SHIVAJI MAIN ROAD, N.R. MOHALLA, MYSORE - 560 007. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.SRIKANTH REDDY.B.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MANMOHAN.P.N., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2998 WP No. 49072 of 2017 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU - 570 001. 3. CITIZEN ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL, NANJANGUD, MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1 & 2; SRI. BASAVARAJU.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Srikanth Reddy.B.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.Manmohan.P.N., for the petitioners and Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2998 WP No. 49072 of 2017 Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Srikanth Reddy.B.S., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 33