VEER PRATAP SINGH @ KALLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/11699/2025 · 2025-11-25
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181253 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181253 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11699 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in the four cases mentioned in the gang chart. In all the cases mentioned in the gang chart, he has been released on bail. The bail orders are on record as Annexure No. 3 to 5 to the bail application. Regarding second case shown in the gang chart, there is specific pleading in paragraph 8 that the applicant is on bail. He has explained criminal history of other three cases in paragraph 12 of the bail application.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the co-accused Rohit Singh and Prabhas Kumar @ Chowkidar have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 14.11.2025 and 11.11.2025 passed in criminal misc. bail application Nos. 11152 of 2025 and 10936 of 2025.
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks parity with the order of the co- accused. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 19.09.2025 and if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishal Srivastava, Sudhakar Arya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Veer Pratap Singh @ Kallu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant. On due consideration to the fact that in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, he has been enlarged on bail; he has explained criminal history of three cases in paragraph 12 of the bail application; co-accused Rohit Singh and Prabhas Kumar @ Chowkidar have been granted bail as well as considering the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 19.09.2025, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Veer Pratap Singh @ Kallu, involved in Case Crime No. 190/2025, Under Sections-3(1) U.P.Gangster Act Police Station- Baghauli District- Hardoi, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial.
November 25, 2025/R.C.
BAIL No. 11699 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench