IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 572 of 2024 ---------- Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav, s/o. Bhola Prasad Yadav, r/o. vill. Jamro, P.O. Jhalar, P.S. Mohanpur, Dist. Deoghar. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, PO + PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 3. Mr. Shashi Prakash Singh, Director (Primary Education), School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, PO + PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 4. Ms. Hemant Sati, Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, Dist. Sahebganj. 5. Kumar Harsh, District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, Dist. Sahebganj. …….. Opp. Parties. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Nath Tiwary, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Sushant Kumar, AC to SC-II ---------- 05/ 07.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court has already been complied with and the required documents have already been sent to the University and CBSE. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties it appears that substantial compliance has been made. As such, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. However, petitioner is at liberty to move before the appropriate forum if any grievance still remains to be adjudicated. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal