KUNWAR BAHADUR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. SMT. PRIYANKA NIRANJAN, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GONDA AND ANOTHER
CAPL/2620/2025 · 2025-11-12
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2620 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Respondents no. 1 & 2 have filed separate compliance affidavits, which are taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that even prior to passing of the interim order dated 10.04.2024, orders dated 14.03.2024 had been passed stayed the transfer of the applicants. The copy of the orders have been annexed as Annexure No. C-2A to the compliance affiavits. It is further submitted that thereafter the State Government has issued Guidelines on 11.06.2025 regarding change of work place of the Technical Assistants working under the MNREGA, copy of which has been enclosed as Annexure C-2 to the compliance affidavits and in pursuance thereof, the applicants have been transferred. It is further submitted that in pursuance of the transfer order, the applicants have already joined the transferred place and some of the similarly situated persons i.e. Technical Assistants approached this Court by filing a writ petition (Writ A No. 7057 of 2025) which was disposed of by judgment and order dated 03.07.2025, hence the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the interim order passed on 10.04.2024 is operative and it is still in existence but he is unable to dispute the submission made by learned Standing Counsel that during the pendency of the writ petition preferred by the applicants, a new guideline has been issued and in pursuance thereof, the applicants have been transferred and they have joined at the new transferred place. On being asked from learned counsel for the applicants as to whether the applicants had ever challenged the new guideline and the subsequent transfer Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Kunwar Bahadur Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) Smt. Priyanka Niranjan, District Magistrate Gonda And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
order passed in pursuance of the said guidelines, he has very fairly replied that against the guidelines and the transfer orders passed in pursuance thereof, the applicants had not filed any writ petition and they joined at the respective place of posting. In view of the facts, circumstances and discussion made hereinabove, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.
Notice if any stands discharged. November 12, 2025 Nitesh CAPL No. 2620 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench