JITENDRI TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
/11248/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181216 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181216 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11248 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.G.A. for respondent no.1 to 3.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent no.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner prays for quashing of the First Information Report dated 25.12.2024, bearing Case Crime No.606 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 504, 352, 341, 294, 506 IPC [85, 352, 131, 126(2), 296, 351(2) B.N.S.] and Section 3(i) Da & 3(i) Dha SC/ST Act, Police Station-Krishna Nagar, District-Lucknow.
4. Contention of learned counsel for petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is sister-in-law of respondent no.4 and petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law of respondent no.4. There is no specific allegation leveled in the impugned F.I.R. against the petitioners, however, in the garb of the impugned F.I.R. the respondent authorities are harassing the petitioners.
5. Learned A.G.A. states that initially the charge-sheet had been filed against petitioner no.2 but on the specific direction of the learned Magistrate, the matter has been sent for further investigation.
6. Considering the aforesaid and the fact that the investigation is still continuing the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Misra, Ravindra Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jitendri Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent authorities to not take any coercive action against the petitioners unless they have some cogent and credible evidence against the petitioners.
7. Needless to mention that the petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation. In case of non-compliance, benefit of this order would not be available to petitioners. November 28, 2025 Arti/- CRLP No. 11248 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench