Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181209 (ALL)

ANJUL TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/10597/2025 · 2025-10-31

Shekhar B Saraf, Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10597 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that no drainage is being built in front of the house of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not been able to indicate anything to the contrary. 3. In light of the same, we do not find any reason to pass any order in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. In the event, any drain is built in front of the house of the petitioner that is not in accordance with the rules and regulations, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the authority or any court in accordance with law. October 31, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Anjul Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Rural Development Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench