Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010188112025 2025:GAU-AS:12317 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2776/2025 AJIM UDDIN SON OF IBRAHIM ALI VILL- BAGHMARA CHAR P.S. ALOPATI DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S H RAHMAN, MR. M S MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 09.09.2025 Heard Mr. S.H Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, 1. Ajim Uddin, who is stated to have been arrested on 09.07.2025, seeking bail in connection with Hatigaon P.S Case No. 126/2025 registered under Sections 140(3)/304(2)/64(1) of BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation in the ejahar dated 17.06.2025 lodged by the alleged victim woman herself is that she was called by some unknown persons with assurance of giving work and thereafter, taking in a vehicle, injected with something and thereafter raped her. It is further alleged that the assailants also took away some valuables including gold ornaments from her. The present accused along with the other co-accused were arrested during investigation. 4. The case diary has been received and investigation is not completed. 5. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State that on the basis of the existing investigation materials that sufficient implicating materials have been found against the present accused and the investigation also indicates their involvement in other such offences in the past as well. 6. I have perused the statements of the informant available in the case diary which lend supports to the allegation. It is also stated in the investigation materials that the CDR analysis corroborates the allegations. 7. In the given facts and circumstances, it may not be prudent to grant bail to the accused at this stage. Accordingly, the bail petition Page No.# 3/3 stands rejected at this stage. 8. Return back the case diary. 9. Accordingly, this bail petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant