Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181179 (ALL)

INDRAPAL @ MITTHU MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/9482/2025 · 2025-11-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9482 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Sangeeta Yadav, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA for the State. 3. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.81 of 2024 under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) IPC and 5(tha)/6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow. 4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed away by the applicant. Subsequently, during trial, neither the informant nor the victim has supported the prosecution story and have been declared hostile. 5. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the informant has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the victim as well as the informant has turned hostile coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sangeeta Yadav Indrapal @ Mitthu Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 15.02.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Indrapal @ Mitthu Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9482 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench