VIJENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/221/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181178 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181178 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 221 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 243 of 2024, under sections 64, 74, 77 BNS, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, Section 66E IT Act, P.S. Sursa, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the applicant used to misbehave with the informant on various occasions. Subsequently the applicant had posted certain videos of the informant on facebook. No allegations of rape was alleged. Subsequently in the statement under Section 180 BNSS the victim stated that she was married and the applicant used to post video on his telephone and wrong was also committed on her. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim stated that wrong was committed on 1.7.2024 and the FIR was lodged on 12.7.2024. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the age of the victim which is more than 18 years and the fact that the victim is already married and huge variance in FIR allegations and two of her statements, however, without commenting Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikas Sharma, Ajeet Kumar Singh, Smriti Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Alok Kumar Mishra Vijendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 28.7.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Vijendra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 221 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench