HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9835 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Sukrit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anirudh Singh, learned A.G.A for the State. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to opposite party no. 4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that he may be permitted to not press the petition at this stage and liberty may be given to file afresh. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed being not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to return all the certified copies of the document to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after retaining the photocopy of the same on record. November 3, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Srivastava, Archana Devi, Sukrit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Ali Zamin @ Ayaan Thru. His Father Shri Mohammad Rashid .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench