HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6465 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey for respondent No.15. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed praying for a direction to opposite party No.1 to decide the interim/stay application under Order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC read with 151 CPC filed in case No.38916 of 2025, computerized case No.T 202510460238916 titled as Asheesh Charan MIttal Vs. Smt. Sukuna and others, filed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the case preferred by the petitioner respondents no order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. 5. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil-Sadar, District Lucknow to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within six weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in case there is no legal impediment. 7. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Chourasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Ashish Charan Mittal .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 8. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. November 4, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6465 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench