Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181111 (ALL)

RAMJEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1381/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1381 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.432 of 2023 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, district Gonda. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that according to the enquiry report of the Anti Fraud Cell, accused No.1 Darshan Lal Prajapati has sold half share of the dispute land of Gata No.276 measuring 0.8090 hectare firstly on 3.12.2022 and the same land has been sold by him in favour of the accused applicant on 14.9.2022. 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused applicant is the bona fide purchaser, having no criminal history. During investigation, the arrest of the applicant was protected vide order dated 27.3.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this court in Crl. Misc. WP.No.2458 of 2025. It is submitted that the respondent No.2 has already filed a civil suit No.1786 of 2023 in the court of Civil Judge(Junior Division), Gonda for cancellation of sale deed dated 14.9.2022 executed by Darshan Lal Prajapati in favour oft he applicant. The applicant has already filed written statement in that suit. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that the applicant shall Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishi Raj, Prashant Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramjeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) cooperate in the trial. 5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. 6.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, the applicant was not arrested during investigation, charge sheet has been filed, order of the Division Bench of this court, referred to above, the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that he shall cooperate in the trial, judgment of Supreme Court in Musheer Alam versus The State of U.P. and another 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant. 7. 7. In view of the above, it is provided that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. On such surrender, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial and he will not influence the witnesses.The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. 8. In case of default, it would be open for the trial court to proceed in accordance with law. 9. The application is allowed accordingly. December 15, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1381 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench