Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:21020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.3424 of 2025 ---- Rishi Kumar Tiwari, aged about 77 years, Son of Late Yadunandan Tiwari, Resident of Village: Chechariya, P.O.: Ataula, P.S.: Meral, District: Garhwa. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, at Garhwa, P.O.+P.S.- Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 3. The Additional Collector Land Reforms, Garhwa, P.O.+P.S.- Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 4. The Circle Officer, Meral, P.O.+P.S.- Meral, District: Garhwa. 5. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Through its Head of Divisional Officer, Ranchi Divisional Office, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. At P.O.-Namkum, P.S.:-Namkum, District:-Ranchi. 6. Jaivardhan Tiwari, Son of Vibhutinath Tiwari, Resident of Village: Chechariya, P.O.: Ataula, P.S.: Meral, District: Garhwa. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Subodh Kr. Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. Rahul Lamba, Adv. Mr. A.M. Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Nilesh Modi, Adv. ----
02/Dated: 30th July, 2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:-
“(A) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) commanding upon the respondent authority to cancel / set-aside the No Objection Certificate, issued in favour of the Private Respondent No. 6, for opening the Petrol Pump (Retail Outlets), over the joint property without taking the consent to the co-owner of the land which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the guideline issued by the Oil Marketing Company. (B) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) commanding upon the respondent authority specially the respondent no. 5, to cancel the Retail Outlets and dealership of the private respondent no. 6, it is submitted that the private respondent no. 6, has not follow the guidelines on selection of dealers for regular and retail
2025:JHHC:21020
Page | 2
W.P. (C) No.3424 of 2025
outlets through draw of lots/bidding process, the private respondent no. 6, even that has not taken any consent from the co-owner of the property regarding the Khata No. 44, Plot No. 12, and Khata No. 40, Plot No. 24, Village /Mauza: Harandubey, Block-Meral, District: Garhwa. (C) For issuance of such other writ, order or direction as may appear just and proper for doing equitable justice to the petitioner.”
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.
3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded