HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10990 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anant Pratap Singh, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2.Instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main reliefs:- (A) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the history sheet of the petitioner at police station- Rampur Mathura District- Sitapur, if any after summoning the same in original from the opposite party no. 3 in the interest of justice. (B) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 3 not to harass the petitioner as well as his family member in any manner, in the interest of justice. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that while issuing the history sheet, which has been challenged by means of the instant writ petition, the mandatory provisions of Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations have not been followed inasmuch as the petitioner is being harassed unnecessarily without there being any criminal history on his part except the criminal cases in which he has been acquitted and he has a good reputation in the locality. 4. In support thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on a Division Bench judgment of this Court passed in the case of Ram Shanker Vs. State of U.P and Ors Neutral Citation No.- 2025:AHC-LKO:51235-DB and has contended on behalf of the petitioner that there is no pending criminal case against him and in all the cases where the petitioner was allegedly involved, either he has been acquitted or a final report has already been submitted. Thus, there is nothing adverse against him at this stage. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA has stated that for the grievances as raised by the petitioner in the instant writ petition, it is always open for him to approach the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jitendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) respondent no. 2 i.e the Superintendent of Police, Sitapur. 6. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 2 by means of a representation within ten days from today. In case, the petitioner files a representation within the time as aforesaid then the respondent no. 2 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law and the relevant rules including the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ram Shanker (supra) which representation would be decided within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation along with a certified copy of this order. 7. The writ petition is disposed of. 8. It is made clear that the Court has not gone into the merits of the case as set forth by the petitioner. November 24, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 10990 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench