RASHID ALIAS RASIDDEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
A482/7371/2025 · 2025-12-03
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7371 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the applicant nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made. As per office report, notice has been served upon the opposite party no.2, but none has put in appearance on his/her behalf. However, learned AGA is present. From perusal of the record, it indicates that in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating. It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has rendered infructuous. In view of above, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous. December 3, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Bhushan Pandey, Narayan Datt Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Rashid Alias Rasiddeen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench