SARIBUN NESSA MAZUMDAR v. DR. J B EKKA, IAS AND 7 ORS
Cont.Cas(C)/527/2022 · 2025-09-10
Rajesh Mazumdar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18105 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18105 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010188732022
2025:GAU-AS:12434
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/527/2022 SARIBUN NESSA MAZUMDAR W/O LATE ASADDAR ALI MAZUMDAR, R/O VILL-TUPKHANA PART-II, P.O.- TUPKHANA VIA TARAPUR RAMNAGAR, P.S.-SILCHAR, DIST-CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788003 VERSUS DR. J B EKKA, IAS AND 7 ORS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:SHANTANU PRASAD GOTMARE IAS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:MANISH THAKUR IAS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:BIKRAM KAIRI IAS THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM JURIPAR SIX MILE
Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI-37 5:SATYANDRA KUMAR SINHA THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX GUWAHATI-6 6:ELDAD FAIHRIEM ACS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CACHAR ZILLA PARISHAD AT SILCHAR P.O.-SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 7:PARTHA SARATHI DAS AFS THE TREASURY OFFICER CACHAR TREASURY AT SILCHAR P.O.-SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 8:SRI RANJAN BORAH AFS THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX GUWAHATI-6 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, Advocate for the Respondent : MR A CHALIHA (R3), MR. S DUTTA (R-6),MR. K KONWAR (R- 6),D J CHAKMA (r-1),MR. A BHATTACHARJEE (r-1),MR. M NATH (r-1),MR. B GOGOI (R3),MR P NAYAK (R3)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 11.09.2025
Page No.# 3/3 It is submitted by Ms. A. Khatun, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner that the orders passed in WP(C) 361/2022 dated 27.04.2022 have been complied with and therefore, nothing survives to be adjudicated in this contempt petition. In view of the above, the contempt petition stands closed. Ms. D.D. Barman, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant